If you aren’t a “Long Blog Reader” skip down to the “Based on a True Story” and answer the questions.
About a year ago, I received a comment from an RS member that said I might be the first public school teacher that he has met that is willing to criticize teacher unions, and he gave me big a thumbs-up.
I now find myself fighting on three fronts as my teaching career may be winding down and we head back to the mission field of China and Nepal.
The first- Unions; I understand them and have been around them (on both sides) since kindergarten. My mom was a teacher and my dad was the School Board President of one of Michigan’s largest districts, for all 12 years of my public school education. In 1977, I voted in my first teacher’s union meeting and the count to “strike” was 399 to 1! That ”one” is spelled GB. It is often not very difficult to put my finger on a problem I observe with many Union choices because it is often about flawed human decisions, and being one of those flawed creatures I can see the how and why of a decision. Union decisions usually are very much “in the present” decisions and can be observed by anyone that is willing to take a close look.
The second –Technology; Union decisions that are made to protect the wrong population that Public Schools were brought into existence for, I can identify and I can confront, but technology often is a tougher issue as it often has the “right look”, with so many “positive contributions” to the educational process, and the negatives get buried below the “new” and “cutting edge” steps that all seem to say, “Forward Motion”. Technology is plain and simply a different “animal” altogether and to put your finger on “the” problems requires some probing well below the surface of the apparent contributions; nonetheless they are there. We should question more and assume less, but “change” has often been our Achilles heel.
If you put the two together, “Unions” and “Technology”, we are now looking at a creature that doesn’t even have a name yet! Unions have acted inappropriately on many occasions and fought for decisions that were compromising the “needs of the student”. I have observed Technology replace the “needs of the student” with something that has the appearance of being wonderful, when in reality it has become, when placed in the wrong hands, an instrument of dependence, and a “shortcut” that robs the student of a drive for more knowledge; in short, technology can be the thief of curiosity. It is this third front, to use a technology term, a “modern program” that has found its way through an eroding “firewall” and is now one of the program files installed in the Operating System of Education. Add/ Remove won’t touch it, and Revo Uninstaller Pro could potentially “remove” the program but it might take more of the registry than we want removed, and so the program- it stays. And eventually the program is actually used with no apparent ill side-effects.
Let me give you an example. Unions want teacher jobs saved. To save teacher jobs in Michigan, scores in math have to reach a certain level or the school now can be taken over by the state. Teachers with 30 years of experience can be fired in a heartbeat by the “Private Business” that bought the district from the state and staffed it with its own new employees. To keep this from happening, decisions will be made to bypass the deficiencies of students entering schools that offer “open enrollment” and technology will be utilized that will “help” the student master what he hasn’t really mastered, so that he can “give” the district enough of a % kick upward to keep the “Evil Ones” at the state level from entering in and shutting down a Union and all of its teachers.
We are rolling students off of the assembly line of Union strategy and Technology innovation that can take a Texas Instrument graphing calculator and graph a quadratic function. Yet these same students cannot spell the words used in the problem and the answer has little meaning. It is a “false kind of learning” and there isn’t any evidence of knowledge stored in living k+ gates to fall back on if the technology should fail (dead batteries!). And then throw in the ridiculousness that we no longer remediate any student at the high school level if they can’t add, subtract, multiply, divide, solve fraction problems, calculate percentages, or find the square footage of a room they want to paint, and you can’t help and wonder: what went wrong and how did we ever get to such a place? Imagine dropping a 10 pound Algebra book on the desk of a 3rd grader. I do it every day. I teach high school by the way!
Technology has outpaced ethics and gone are the days where we ask before we build, “is this use of technology going to be in the best interest of our students?” Unions have for decades led teachers down paths of “self-preservation”, and found a way to also outpace the ethical implications of what they are actually “forcing” upon future generations of teachers and ultimately the students.
We currently are moving toward an educational system that is highly technology-based. Did anyone ask the question 30 years ago, “Is this the road we want to travel?” and “If we travel a road that is full of technology, will it be “technology based/enhanced”, or “technology driven”? And most importantly- was the question asked, “How vital is this technology to a child’s development so that he can read and wants to read more, has mastered the basics of math and has a number sense that is developed, and is able to write whole sentences that make sense?”
Will we behold the wonder of a student who “holds on with dear life” to that “human component” of what we used to call “learning”? Will we observe students coming off the “assembly line” that are highly inquisitive, with knowledge-packed nervous systems that were a result of good ole’ fashion learning, and curious minds, that couldn’t get enough?” For these students technology was simply one of their tools at their disposal that served them rather than robbed them.
Unions were implemented at a time when employees were often mistreated and taken advantage of. As they grew was anyone asking the questions that could have prevented unions from dictating educational implications that would go far beyond the “protection of the teacher” and ultimately have the power to deprive students of their right and “need” to master those skills that would serve them in life and their ongoing pursuit of knowledge, rather than providing students with test taking “shortcuts” that embraced the power of technology to boost the scores of a district.
Like it or not, Moore’s law very well could be Moore’s curse and the rapid development of technology is creating a shooting gallery within the walls of education where we are trying and implementing so many new and changing “methods” of “learning through technology” that there is no doubt that we will be sweeping up a whole lot of debris that looked exciting at the time, but helped produce a student that cuts and pastes is way to an “A” paper (teachers can’t keep up), and who really don’t have a clue how a quiet moment in a forest with a good book, could be the key to unlock the genius of a highly gifted human mind, that technology simply was unable to produce the right chemical neurotransmitters between the 100’s of Billions of nerve synapses that make the latest 32 nanometer CPU look like a first grade connect-the-dots coloring book. Like it or not; sometimes the greatness of a mind is opened up to do amazing things by a hand-written poem from the an author who never worked under the glow of a light bulb.
Seriously does anyone really care about the 140 character limit of someone’s Twitter, other than it is just one more evidence that we humans like to be the first to the top. Has anyone asked the question, “Is the concept of Twitter absolutely foolish kid’s stuff that has managed to make politicians and CEO”s felt that they are deficient because they don’t have 35,000 followers?” If you twitter or don’t twitter, does it produce different types of on-going learners? Do we Tweet out of curiosity driven my an unquenchable thirst to learn? Do we want to “Be Read”, or “Read” Tweets? How many unanswered questions are there as we just passed 10 billion tweets? When McDonalds sold their Billionth Hamburger was that a boost to the national SAT average?
Maybe we all need a little more of “my space”, where my curiosity, learning and quest for learning is protected and not crowded out by on-line activities. Read this article: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/20/education/20wired.html
Are we in jeopardy of twittering away a wealth of human intellect, because Technology is calling us to follow, and Unions don’t have the guts to say “NO!”?
I have been fighting a difficult battle for the past 3 years and ironically, technology (something that we are all “into” here at RS), has made it exponentially more difficult to produce change that benefits many of today’s youth. The American Public Schools System is in trouble and few will argue against that statement. But so is the Auto Industry, the Housing Market, Wall Street, and… Well the list is endless. I have been monitoring the impact of technology and the response of educators to that impact and it is glaringly apparent that technology is no longer “the tool”. Technology has become the “dictator”, and even Unions, who have had, what many would say, far too great an impact on what happens within the Public School System; even Unions are helplessly surrendered to the power of technology’s demands and expectations.
Technology has outpaced “ethics” and Unions, who often cast “ethics” to the wind, are more than happy to borrow from technology whatever will help them with their teacher centered objectives.
And now for the “Based on a True Story” illustration; you decide.
For those that aren’t big fans of Teacher Unions, here is a thought to think over.
For those that support the role that Unions play in public school education, here is your chance to defend your position.
If 80 high school freshmen fail the first semester of a one year Algebra I class, what are their chances of passing the more difficult second semester of the course?
Because in high school you can get a 1/2 credit for passing a semester class, would it make sense to have one of the two Algebra teachers in our school teach the first semester Algebra I during the second semester, for all those who failed and received no-credit?
Would it be a better work environment for those who passed the first semester to continue on in a room of students that have mastered the content and are capable of moving on at a quicker pace?
Does it sound reasonable to not only teach once again, the material that wasn’t fully grasped by the failing group, but also at the same time identify the individual reasons for the failure and simultaneously work on those issues that contributed to the failing?
If you were a parent of a child who failed the first semester, would you rather pay for two summer school 1/2 credits or just pay for one?
For those that can’t afford summer school, does it make sense to catch them up during the second semester of their freshmen year as much as possible and during the following fall offer a 2nd semester Algebra I course and have these students take two math classes during the first semester- Algebra 1 2nd Semester, along with a year of required Geometry? (The first semester of Algebra I is the critical portion as far as preparing a student to handle Geometry.)
Do you think that those that failed the first semester of Algebra I are going to enhance or become a distraction to the students that did pass and are now moving forward with high hopes of getting the entire credit?
And how did we manage to take a group of students that were anywhere from 3 to 6 years behind in the math and reading skills manage to even teach from a 9th grade Algebra book? (If your child is using a calculator in elementary school, may I suggest you consider putting it in the fireplace!!)
What do you think we did?
Why?